Re: misc SEGV's

[Igor Schein <igor@txc.com>]

On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:41:52PM +0200, Karim BELABAS wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Igor Schein wrote:
> > Here're some basic examples of lack of strict argument
> > checking in current CVS:
[snip]
> Actually, there was (relatively) strict argument checking.
> But one line too late...
> 
> These are fixed now.

Here're more:

? galoissubcyclo(vector(3,x,0));          \\ SEGV
  ***   bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report
? galoissubfields(vector(8,x,0));         \\ SEGV
  ***   bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report
? quadhilbert(vector(10,x,0));            \\ SEGV
  ***   bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report

This one is more interesting,  as seemingly identical input
results in different behavior:

? vector(13,x,0)
%1 = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
? elltors(vector(13,x,0))
  ***   precision too low in torselldoud.
? elltors(%1)
  ***   bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report
? elltors(vector(13,x,0))
  ***   precision too low in torselldoud.
? elltors(%1)
  ***   bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report

Thanks

Igor