Igor Schein on Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:02:37 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: gp + readline + script = mess |
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 07:45:17PM -0400, Michael Somos wrote: > pari-dev, > > Igor Schein asked : > > > I don't see why one would prefer unix script(1) over gp's native \l > > logging capability. Alternatively, you can 'gp |& tee <filename>'. > > and he has two good alternatives that do almost what I want and have > come to expect from my use of 'script'. I am happy that he finds them > to his liking, however, I think I have good reasons to expect that > readline should behave reasonably like it used to. If this is regarded > as a personal matter, then so be it. For testing purposes, at least, I > am going to have to disable readline if it can't behave. Shalom, Michael A couple followup remarks. 1) I can confirm this problem. It appears to be Mandrake bug, RedHat behaves properly. I've found one more Mandrake-specific readline problem in the past, namely that if you paste a long line into gp session, it takes very long time, as opposed to instantaneously on RedHat. I didn't post it to the list because it's not a pari/gp bug. 2) I believe there's no way to disable readline on the fly, no do I believe there should be one. If I were choosing readline-less binary+script versus readline+\l, I don't think it's a close call. I doubt I'd be the only one to choose the latter alternative either. Just my thoughts. Igor