Re: yet another rnfkummer() posting

[Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:42:33AM -0700, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:40:53AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > BTW, can you check with Math::Pari before release(s)?  It would
> > > immediately report the mismatches in the signature (when the string
> > > signature is changed to "a complicated one", but the numeric one is
> > > not changed to 99).
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, the current version does not report the function *names*, only suspicious signatures.  >>TODO.
> > 
> > I have completly get rid of signatures in the description system.
> 
> What does it mean?  That the CVS version has your updates?

No, but as previoulsy stated in this list the path is available 
at <http://www.math.u-bordeaux.fr/~allomber/desc>
iThe latest version is  desc-20020731.tar.gz 

> > Instead I use a perl script that compute signatures. This is imbedded
> > in the make_proto822.pl script.

Cheers,

Bill