Igor Schein on Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:26:31 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
another cases of Bach constant cheating |
Hi, ? gettime;forstep(k=2.,.3,-.1,print1(k" ");setrand(1579152476);bnr=bnrinit(bnfinit(quadpoly(13829,y),,[k,k]*1.),211,1);rnfkummer(bnr,[5,1;0,1]);print(round(gettime/10^3)"s")) 2.000000000000000000000000000 34s 1.900000000000000000000000000 34s 1.800000000000000000000000000 34s 1.700000000000000000000000000 20s 1.600000000000000000000000000 20s 1.500000000000000000000000000 20s 1.400000000000000000000000000 20s 1.300000000000000000000000000 20s 1.200000000000000000000000000 20s 1.100000000000000000000000000 20s 1.000000000000000000000000000 20s 0.9000000000000000000000000002 36s 0.8000000000000000000000000002 *** user interrupt after 33mn, 28,380 ms. If bound is less then 0.9, rnfkummer() enters an infinite loop ( true infinite loop, no doubling the bound ). Also, timing pattern is a bit peculiar, 36s at 0.9. Thanks Igor