Re: Zeta function bug?

Bill Allombert on Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:15:16 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Zeta function bug?

To: pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: Zeta function bug?
From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:08:26 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:15:16 +0100
In-reply-to: <20040114203543.GB26044@geo.math.u-psud.fr>
Mail-followup-to: pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact pari-dev-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20040106235941.GA21752@geo.math.u-psud.fr> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0401071218350.14863-100000@wumpus.its.uow.edu.au> <20040114203543.GB26044@geo.math.u-psud.fr>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:35:43PM +0100, Karim Belabas wrote:
> * Andrew John Walker <ajw01@uow.edu.au> [2004-01-07 02:19]:
> >>
> > Thanks very much Karim. I'd appreciate if the Windows version
> > could be updated whenever convenient. 
> 
> I have just updated the Windows binary. Sorry for the delay !

What is involved in building the Window binary ?
Is there any way we can streamline the process a bit ?
Ideally set up a autobuilder similar to what is done for
the buildlog ?

Cheers,
Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zeta function bug?
  - From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Patch: default(sopath), default(outputsp[aces])
Next by Date: Re: Zeta function bug?
Previous by thread: Re: Patch: default(sopath), default(outputsp[aces])
Next by thread: Re: Zeta function bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread