Karim Belabas on Wed, 12 May 2004 11:25:33 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: round4 performance |
* Bill Allombert [2004-05-08 19:32]: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:35:40PM +0200, Xavier-François Roblot wrote: > > Well, I have modified update_alpha (after Karim pointed out a strange > > behavior in this function) and that kind of miraculously speed up > > dramatically that example!... As you will see, the computing time is now > > very reasonable and it runs with a small stack too (I hope the result is > > still correct though, I haven't checked yet). Igor, Karim and I still > > have some ideas for improvements for nilord but you need some new bad > > polynomials to test them. Please send me your worst examples! > > Well, I have retested and now this is much faster, also respm was > improved, so galoisinit() is a bit faster also. > Igor example needs 41s and 16MB of RAM. Can you update and test again ? I have cleaned up my respm() improvements and may have introduced regressions. The main idea is to replace plain hnfmodid() by -- hnfmodidpart() [ don't clean up upper triangular matrix once diagonal is known ] -- hnfmodidraw() [ reduce mod d * Id, but don't append d * Id ]. I have checked carefully each use of the function to see which of the above applied, but I may have made a mistake. [ Currently, plain hnfmodid() is not used anymore. ] Thanks, Karim. -- Karim Belabas Tel: (+33) (0)1 69 15 57 48 Dep. de Mathematiques, Bat. 425 Fax: (+33) (0)1 69 15 60 19 Universite Paris-Sud http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~belabas/ F-91405 Orsay (France) http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/ [PARI/GP]