Re: looking for UltraSparc3i binary

[Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:16:02AM +0100, Alain SMEJKAL wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:59:34PM +0100, Alain SMEJKAL wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Igor Schein" <igor@txc.com>
> > > To: "Alain SMEJKAL" <a.smejkal@free.fr>
> > > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:43 PM
> > > Subject: Re: looking for UltraSparc3i binary
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Is UltraSparc3i a requirement?  How about ultra3cu?
> > > 
> > > Ultra3cu will be nice too, I suppose it will not induce significant changes
> > > and binary should be compatible. 64-bit mode is more essential for that
> > > test.
> > 
> > See attached.  readline is disabled, which shouldn't matter for
> > testing purposes anyway. 
> 
> Thanks so much for your prompt help!

Since you have access to solaris box, could you look at the bug report
#429 ?

Thanks in advance,
Bill.