Re: msvc optimization bug

Bill Allombert on Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:18:02 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: msvc optimization bug

To: pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: msvc optimization bug
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:16:10 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:18:02 +0200
In-reply-to: <F4E68EDD7F874D2286EDAA72306B4840@box1win32>
Mail-followup-to: pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact pari-dev-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <F4E68EDD7F874D2286EDAA72306B4840@box1win32>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:17:48AM +0100, Jason Moxham wrote:
> I've narrowed it down to the functionstatic void    closure_eval(GEN C)As 
> long as that function is compiled with NO optimization then ffision test  
> passesJason 

Good! Maybe now you can find you what actually happens ?

Cheers,
Bill.

References:
- msvc optimization bug
  - From: "Jason Moxham" <jason@njkfrudils.plus.com>

Prev by Date: Re: times
Next by Date: Re: Pari Slowdown?
Previous by thread: msvc optimization bug
Next by thread: times
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread