John Cremona on Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:14:30 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Polroots/mod suggestion |
Thanks for that -- his comments had seemed completely stupid to me, but I did not know that he had such a history. Strangely enough, gmail put this email of yours into spam (but not those of Wanless)! I only found it by chance while looking for something else which I though might have gone astray. John Cremona On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Phil Carmody <thefatphil@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > --- On Sun, 3/13/11, Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:53:15PM >> +0000, James Wanless wrote: >> > (Right, hopefully I really do mean to post to _this_ list this time :) >> > I wonder if the devs would be interested in the following suggestion >> > for finding roots of a general nth order polynomial, or same mod p: >> > The idea is basically recursive completion of the square ie, solve >> > for roots using the standard quadratic solution formula, but >> > iterated. >> > Each level of iteration would allow equations of up to 2^nth order >> > to be solved, as n++ >> >> How this is supposed to work ? > > I've never seen anything sensible from him on sci.math, and plenty of complete nonsense. Until he became a permanent entry in my killfile. After that he popped his head up on one of the prime number related lists I help moderate, and his gibbering of nonsense caused a swift always-moderated flag to appear next to his name there too. > > Let's pull some typical Wanless gibbering out of the google: > http://www.bearnol.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Math/fermat.html > > In short - he's best ignored. > > Phil > > > >