Bill Allombert on Wed, 06 Jun 2012 22:12:08 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: ellpow renamed to ellmul |
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 08:53:14PM +0100, John Cremona wrote: > On 6 June 2012 20:06, Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote: > > Dear PARI developers, > > > > I have renamed the GP function ellpow to ellmul, for symmetry with elladd. > > (ellpow is still available for backward compatibility, but deprecated). > > I have also renamed the matching C functions. > > > > It was awkward to have both elladd and ellpow. > > I have also added a function ellneg for completeness. > > Hooray! Well, if you have other potential hooray moment, please share them with us, this might increase the likelyhood they get from potential to actual [1]. Cheers, Bill. [1] as long as you do not ask us to prove BSD of course, but elliptic curves over finite fields are OK (hint, hint).