Re: new GP loop: forpart()

Joerg Arndt on Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:00:34 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: new GP loop: forpart()

To: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: new GP loop: forpart()
From: Joerg Arndt <arndt@jjj.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 11:00:27 +0200
Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:00:34 +0200
In-reply-to: <20130605084301.GC8532@jjj.de>
References: <20130528221827.GA18685@yellowpig> <20130605084301.GC8532@jjj.de>

* Joerg Arndt <arndt@jjj.de> [Jun 05. 2013 10:50]:
> * Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> [May 30. 2013 14:06]:
> [...]
> 

> Documentation issue:
> This (as least as displayed) is not lex order, but colex.

Correction: (the list above too small to see what's going on)
 forpart(p=10,print(p))  gives it away:

Ordering is
major order: number of parts, decreasing,
minor order is reversed lex.

Sorry for the earlier error!

> [...]

References:
- Re: new GP loop: forpart()
  - From: Joerg Arndt <arndt@jjj.de>

Prev by Date: Re: new GP loop: forpart()
Next by Date: Re: new GP loop: forpart()
Previous by thread: Re: new GP loop: forpart()
Next by thread: Re: new GP loop: forpart()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread