Re: Problem with Flx_ffisom function

[Jean-Pierre Flori <flori@enst.fr>]

2014-12-05 17:49 GMT+01:00 Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux.fr>:
> * Jean-Pierre Flori [2014-12-05 17:37]:
>> The only fix on your side should then be to modify the doc.
>> At the moment it just says "same as FpX_ffisom" and that one eats
>> polynomials with multiprecision coeffs.
>
> The documentation says
>
>   "as FpX_ffisom"
>
> which is (I think) accurate. Almost all Flx_* function derive from an
> FpX_* function, and behave similarly but for the fact that they take
> Flx arguments rather than FpX. Most of them are (minimally but IMHO
> accurately) documented in the same way. :-)
>
> N.B. Same for FqX, FpXQ, Flxq, etc. lots of variants behaving in similar
> ways but for their argument types; usually only one of them is documented
> in depth and the other just quickly refer to that one. (Polymorphism is
> not the strong point of the C language, unfortunately...)
Sure, that makes sense.
To conclude, I would then say that I was confused by the "ZX" in FpX_ffisom doc.

Thanks a lot for your answers and patience.

Best,
>
> Cheers,
>
>     K.B.
> --
> Karim Belabas, IMB (UMR 5251)  Tel: (+33) (0)5 40 00 26 17
> Universite de Bordeaux         Fax: (+33) (0)5 40 00 69 50
> 351, cours de la Liberation    http://www.math.u-bordeaux1.fr/~kbelabas/
> F-33405 Talence (France)       http://pari.math.u-bordeaux1.fr/  [PARI/GP]
> `
>



-- 
Jean-Pierre Flori