Bill Allombert on Sat, 26 Nov 2022 09:48:23 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: 3^k performance |
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 08:47:39AM +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote: > > A022330_1(n)=1+n+sum(k=1,n,logint(3^k,2)) > > A022330_2(n)=my(t=1);1+n+sum(k=1,n,logint(t*=3,2)) > > ? A022330_1(10^5) > cpu time = 8,322 ms, real time = 8,352 ms. > %15 = 7924941755 > > ? A022330_2(10^5) > cpu time = 215 ms, real time = 217 ms. > %16 = 7924941755 > > > So about a 40x difference. > > > Is that worthwhile to look into? > How to best approach that? The simplest approach would be to use powers(3,10^5), with to caveat: - this would require much more memory. - the powers function has a bug and is very slow for integers. A022330_3(n)=my(t=1,P=powers(3,n+1));1+n+sum(k=1,n,logint(P[k+1],2)) Cheers, Bill