Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?

Bill Allombert on Sat, 30 Sep 2023 10:44:56 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?

To: Charles Greathouse <crgreathouse@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 10:44:51 +0200
References: <51fc8aff2a2c547688d3a9323fec60e4@stamm-wilbrandt.de> <ZRFAHJv3mCyktokN@seventeen> <1015bef1702b5e8e149073feb3a1f11a@stamm-wilbrandt.de> <CANXmBjywyZwFN_qb+SUDnN+NcDzuRNx6HUEngiKk2na5dQHB6A@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 08:29:16AM -0400, Charles Greathouse wrote:
> I would definitely use a # operator if it were added. But I don’t mind the
> decision to leave the operator space clean; there are a lot of use cases
> for PARI/GP and clutter is a real concern.

We added # yesterday as an experiment. 
I hope it will work for you!

Cheers,
Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?
  - From: hermann@stamm-wilbrandt.de

References:
- primorial operator '#' for GP?
  - From: hermann@stamm-wilbrandt.de
- Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?
  - From: hermann@stamm-wilbrandt.de
- Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?
  - From: Charles Greathouse <crgreathouse@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: bug in simplify_shallow
Next by Date: Re: bug in simplify_shallow
Previous by thread: Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?
Next by thread: Re: primorial operator '#' for GP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread