Re: reference parameters

Bill Allombert on Mon, 25 Dec 2023 22:44:59 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: reference parameters

To: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: reference parameters
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 22:44:55 +0100
References: <ccbdbb55-566e-4fb5-a6ba-4219bcd1704a@isolution.nl> <ZYnLIv7DMquNtA+J@seventeen> <41d64563-854d-455d-8174-7bb28399ae8b@isolution.nl>

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 08:09:42PM +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
> OK, I presumed that (it would be safe to make) both
> 
> listput( ~L, ... ) and listput( L, ... )do exactly the same.

Yes, they do exactly the same thing, for backward compatibility.

Cheers,
Bill

References:
- reference parameters
  - From: "Ruud H.G. van Tol" <rvtol@isolution.nl>
- Re: reference parameters
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: reference parameters
  - From: "Ruud H.G. van Tol" <rvtol@isolution.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Finding bitness of gp
Next by Date: bug in x1=Mod(x+X,X^2+1)^2?
Previous by thread: Re: reference parameters
Next by thread: bug in x1=Mod(x+X,X^2+1)^2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread