Re: Degree overflow in pow_monome

Bill Allombert on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:01:19 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Degree overflow in pow_monome - PARI

To: pari-users <pari-users@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: Degree overflow in pow_monome - PARI
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:54:28 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:01:19 +0100
In-reply-to: <70406321003172306s576d5060yf322c6dc55b2cbd1@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: pari-users <pari-users@list.cr.yp.to>
Mailing-list: contact pari-users-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <70406321003171932l5a03397ah131d37280d0e495e@mail.gmail.com> <70406321003172306s576d5060yf322c6dc55b2cbd1@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:06:32AM -0500, Phat Tran wrote:
> Back to the problem, I found that the function gpowgs() had caused the
> error. I replaced it with powgi(), but it gave me a wrong answer. (I got a
> correct answer by using GP). I assigned m, n, b and d 30-digit numbers.
> Any help ?

You also need to replace gmodulss(1, n) by gmodulsg(1, n), since
n is not a "long int".

Cheers,
Bill.

References:
- Degree overflow in pow_monome - PARI
  - From: Phat Tran <minhphat@gmail.com>
- Re: Degree overflow in pow_monome - PARI
  - From: Phat Tran <minhphat@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Degree overflow in pow_monome - PARI
Next by Date: Low-degree test polynomials with different signatures
Previous by thread: Re: Degree overflow in pow_monome - PARI
Next by thread: Re: Degree overflow in pow_monome - PARI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread