| Bill Allombert on Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:12:42 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: gp/pari version of the "Map" datatype and "reduce" function |
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:11:18PM -0400, Charles Greathouse wrote: > I think "fold" is good and avoids clashes. There is the question of associativity. I suggest we make it strictly less associative. However to answer Richard, lots of GP functions fold automatically, or there are variants that do: ? vecmax([1,2,3]) %2 = 3 ? gcd([4,6,9]) %3 = 1 ? factorback([1,2,3,4]) %4 = 24 Cheers, Bill.