Bill Allombert on Wed, 09 Oct 2019 14:33:34 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: the minimal polynomial over the composite field |
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:46:15PM +0900, macsyma wrote: > Factoring by galoisfixedfield(,,2) is attractive, > but it seems time-consuming to put together preparations for that. This is true. galoissplittinginit is doing much more initialization that what you need. You need much smaller bound. > > Also your example x^n-2 are very sparse which make computation > > faster compared to generic example. > How about 2*(1+x)^n-x^n (dense and having an isomorphic splitting field) ? This is not a good idea: polredbest will reduce it to x^25-2 in 104ms. I think you should allow for the number field discriminant to get larger, not the model. I am concerned that optimizing the program for such easy case will make it slower when trying large example. I suggest you try polynomial from Klüners-Malle database: <http://galoisdb.math.upb.de> You can search for the property 'is solvable'. Cheers, Bill.