Bill Allombert on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:18:57 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: gp2c question |
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 08:42:48AM +0100, John Cremona wrote: > Thanks Bill. As a follow-up question, is it possible to use the > parallel computation system with gp2c? Of course! In fact it is sometime a bit easier than with GP. However parfor is only available for GP2C in the master PARI branch. > I have a very simple script > which is doing a Monte Carlo sampling, and obviously I want to sample > as many points as I can. The script takes 28m7s for 10^9 samples and > 10x that (actually 4h27m20s) for 10^10. If I could run it in parallel > x10 then I could get to 10^11 without waiting too long. Of course I > can also run the script I have 10 times in parallel using gnu parallel > or similar -- perhaps that is easier anyway. Try to use parapply in GP, and then compile with GP2C. See https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/Events/PARI2019/talks/parallel.pdf Cheers, Bill.