Re: logical operators -- documentation

[Vincent Delecroix <vincent.delecroix@u-bordeaux.fr>]

As far as I understand, your example does not contradict
the documentation.

n%2==1 || 1<0 && 3<2 || 3>2

should be read

(((n%2==1) || 1<0) && 3<2) || 3>2

This is the meaning of "from left to right" as you start
evaluating the innermost operation.

Vincent

Le 07/12/2021 à 13:46, Paul Underwood a écrit :
> I am sorry for using "associativity" wrongly.
>
> I don't think it is "precedence"; Both || and && have the same "priority" in the documentation.
>
> Here is another example:
>
> for(n=1,9,if(n%2==1 || 1<0 && 3<2 || 3>2 ,print1(n" ")))
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
>
> I think the documentation should read "right to left". It currently reads:
>
> "Any sequence of logical or and and operations is evaluated from left to right, and aborted as soon as the final truth value is known."
>
> I think the upshot is that || does appear to have great precedence than &&.
> Best
>
> Paul