Re: gcdext() for polynomials

Bill Allombert on Wed, 03 May 2023 18:10:17 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcdext() for polynomials

To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: gcdext() for polynomials
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 18:08:39 +0200
References: <CAJkPp5P942=W+L32dtXi4o7UXN+1hH8dzuExjmyoET5N2Ccfog@mail.gmail.com> <ZE0uKigxKUxKmjyE@seventeen> <CAJkPp5P0ToGSDLYpHW0YCYFp5Zm-G+d7Q6YFkHJsaLYNq6vwZQ@mail.gmail.com> <ZFGJZhNHMqjLnEAr@seventeen> <CANXmBjwiXn7dEdXrXY4NKTKYnt1iCboGMe1PFfVBxxUCQ5cAxQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:51:49AM -0400, Charles Greathouse wrote:
> Perhaps the difficulty of working around variable priority makes Max's
> request reasonable.

It is far safer and more efficient to setup the variables with the right
priority from the start.

Changing variables is not free.

Cheers,
Bill

References:
- Re: gcdext() for polynomials
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: gcdext() for polynomials
  - From: Charles Greathouse <crgreathouse@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: gcdext() for polynomials
Next by Date: p-adic valuation under insufficient p-adic precision
Previous by thread: Re: gcdext() for polynomials
Next by thread: p-adic valuation under insufficient p-adic precision
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread