| Bill Allombert on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:56:20 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: threadsizemax management |
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 02:24:55PM +0200, Jean-Luc Arnaud wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm quite sure htreadsizemax is managed on a per thread basis, isn't? Each threads has a separate stack which can increase independantly of the other, yes. > I have a script using 2 threads, and only one generates Warning: increasing > size stack to... > > So, I think it's possible to set up threadsizemax to a larger value than the > full amount of available RAM. Am i right? > > For example, I have a Mac with 64 GB or RAM. Setting up threadsizemax to 30 > GB would work as long as only 2 threads increase to 30 GB. Yes on Linux. On Macos, It depends how Macos handles overcommit. > What happens if a third thread tries to increase its stack? I guess this > will generate a "Memory is full" or "No more memory available" error. Right? Yes. > And what if a thread terminates? Will its stack be freed, allocating more > memory for other threads? No. The memory for all threads is freed when the last thread end. Cheers, Bill