hermann on Tue, 05 Dec 2023 21:23:24 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: PARI/GP pthread questions |
On 2023-12-04 10:36, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 05:04:58PM +0100, hermann@stamm-wilbrandt.de wrote:I really like the GP notation of "#" for "number of" in eg. "#binary(n)".What I asked for was not changing behavior. I asked about correcting doc (3.2.24 wrt pthread): https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/manuals/2.15.4/users.pdf#page=125Indeed, but what wording do you suggest, that is understandable by someonewith little experience with parallel computing ?
Given that the reader of PARI/GP doc knows that, replace • pthread: number of threads (unlimited, default: number of cores) with (for current implementation)• pthread: number of threads (unlimited, default: number of hardware threads^1)
... ^1 = #sockets * #cores_per-socket * #threads_per_core One could append " (as reported by lscpu under Linux)" or not. Regards, Hermann.