Gareth Ma on Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:25:54 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Precision too low in bnfisprincipal |
Thank you both for the help, it works perfectly now :) I used the `flag=` because I came from Sage, but I'll stop doing that. Best regards,Gareth On 21/12/2023 10:46, Bill Allombert
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:02:45AM +0000, Gareth Ma wrote:Sorry, I accidentally hit sent. Here is the code and output again: ? \p 20000 ? bnf = bnfinit(x^2 + 199, flag=1);Please do not write 'flag=', just bnfinit(x^2 + 199,1) is better, this avoid creating a global variable flag that will cause problem later.? bnfisprincipal(bnf, bnf.gen[1] ^ 9)You cannot use ^ this way, because this compute the power of the HNF matrix, and not the ideal. ? nfisideal(bnf, bnf.gen[1] ^ 9) %2 = 0 \\ not an ideal! Use instead idealpow(bnf, bnf.gen[1], 9) Just doing ? bnf = bnfinit(x^2 + 199, 1); ? bnfisprincipal (bnf,idealpow(bnf,bnf.gen[1],9)) %2 = [[0]~,[22,1]~] works fine. Cheers, Bill. |