| hermann on Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:49:12 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Questions on alternative set notations |
Alternative set notations are documented here: https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/manuals/2.17.2/users.pdf#page=25 As an example I am interested in Euler polynomial values ? [k^2+k+41|k<-[0..11]] [41, 43, 47, 53, 61, 71, 83, 97, 113, 131, 151, 173] ? that belong to Mod(1,4). Which of the following is preferable?(1+2 filter, so 50% of the values; 3 results in 100% of initial set values)
? [k^2+k+41|k<-[0..11],(k%4)%3==0] [41, 53, 61, 97, 113, 173] ? ? [k|l<-[0..11];k<-[l^2+l+41],k%4==1] [41, 53, 61, 97, 113, 173] ? ? [k^2+k+41|l<-[0..11];k<-[(l\2)*4+3*(l%2)]] [41, 53, 61, 97, 113, 173, 197, 281, 313, 421, 461, 593] ?Is there a more natural alternative to sequence assignment workaround "...;k<-[f(l)]..." that works in alternative sets?
Regards, Hermann.