| Karim BELABAS on Fri, 3 Mar 2000 18:06:08 +0100 (MET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [PATCH 2.0.18] \x upgraded |
[Ilya:]
> I strongly disagree. C-like code would
>
> a) work with struct* instead of long*;
>
> b) would allocate new things by macros parameterized by the type of
> the allocated thing;
>
> thus would completely clear the code from the dependence on the
> details of internal representation of the PARI types.
Ok, ok, I'm not going to defend PARI current coding style anyway. I
basically agree with you [ and the initial patch was not rejected, but "put
on hold" until the long overdue official release is out ].
Another subject:
I intend to modify a bit your prettyprinter [nice job, btw, and it even
exhibited a bug in TeX output: 1
... + O(x 7) ]
1) make "prettyprinter" the name of the default prettyprinter (empty = use
current "beautified" format, which is ugly).
default(output,2) [or shortcut \o 2] would trigger it. This way it'll be
easier to disable/enable it without writing further user functions.
2) make it portable [ using undocumented try_pipe() and pariFILE type ]. As
is stands it will break compilation on a number of platforms (e.g WinCE
devices...).
Would it be OK if I included tex2mail in the PARI distribution ? [ I could
leave the URL at strategic places, but it would be more convenient that way
for casual users ]
Cheers,
Karim.
__
Karim Belabas email: Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr
Dep. de Mathematiques, Bat. 425
Universite Paris-Sud Tel: (00 33) 1 69 15 57 48
F-91405 Orsay (France) Fax: (00 33) 1 69 15 60 19
--
PARI/GP Home Page: http://www.parigp-home.de/