Justin C. Walker on Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:24:45 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Bug testing 'nfields' |
Hi, all, I have built the following versions of Pari/GP, for Mac OS X, 10.4.5: Dual G5/PowerPC: (1.1502) Core Duo/ix86: (1.1500)In both cases, I get a 'make bench' failure with 'nfields': checking the full output, I see this:
G5: ? rnfinit(nf2,x^5-x-2) *** rnfinit: bug in GP (Bus Error), please report ? nfisincl(x^2+1,x^4+1) *** nfisincl: bug in GP (Bus Error), please report Core Duo: ? rnfinit(nf2,x^5-x-2) *** rnfinit: bug in GP (Bus Error), please report ? factornf(x^3+x^2-2*x-1,t^3+t^2-2*t-1) *** factornf: bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report ? nfisincl(x^2+1,x^4+1) *** nfisincl: bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report ? nfisisom(x^3+x^2-2*x-1,x^3+x^2-2*x-1) *** nfisisom: bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please reportThe two Core Duo seg faults that don't appear in the G5 case show up in the latter as complaints about a shortage of primes.
Are these known problems?I ran the same check with 1.1277; it finished without any complaints. Well, just one, which is repeated in all three cases:
? setrand(1);bnfclassunit(x^2-x-100000)*** bnfclassunit: Warning: insufficient precision for fundamental units, not given.
Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large, Director Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income -------- The path of least resistance: it's not just for electricity any more. --------