Bill Allombert on Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:11:13 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Bug testing 'nfields' |
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:18:39PM -0800, Justin C. Walker wrote: > Hi, all, > > I have built the following versions of Pari/GP, for Mac OS X, 10.4.5: > Dual G5/PowerPC: (1.1502) > Core Duo/ix86: (1.1500) Hello Justin, Which gcc build are you using ? > In both cases, I get a 'make bench' failure with 'nfields': checking > the full output, I see this: > > G5: > ? rnfinit(nf2,x^5-x-2) > *** rnfinit: bug in GP (Bus Error), please report > ? nfisincl(x^2+1,x^4+1) > *** nfisincl: bug in GP (Bus Error), please report > > Core Duo: > ? rnfinit(nf2,x^5-x-2) > *** rnfinit: bug in GP (Bus Error), please report > ? factornf(x^3+x^2-2*x-1,t^3+t^2-2*t-1) > *** factornf: bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report > ? nfisincl(x^2+1,x^4+1) > *** nfisincl: bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report > ? nfisisom(x^3+x^2-2*x-1,x^3+x^2-2*x-1) > *** nfisisom: bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report > > The two Core Duo seg faults that don't appear in the G5 case show up > in the latter as complaints about a shortage of primes. > > Are these known problems? > > I ran the same check with 1.1277; it finished without any > complaints. Well, just one, which is repeated in all three cases: > ? setrand(1);bnfclassunit(x^2-x-100000) > *** bnfclassunit: Warning: insufficient precision for fundamental > units, not given. I don't know if it is related we received bug #383 about problems on Mac OS X that we could not reproduce: ? fordiv(4,X,print(X)) *** fordiv: bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report Can you reproduce that as well ? Cheers, Bill.