REIX, Tony on Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:22:20 +0100


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Port of pari/gp 2.7.5 on AIX


<green> & <cyan>  ????
I cannot distinguish the 2 colors !
I've tried with a colleague on another display, and that's the same !
I would suggest to use 2 colors that are really different.

About performance, my goal is to check that there is no test where performance on AIX is abnormally lower than it should be compared to linux/intel. So, are you saying that this check is impossible ?

Thx

Tony



Le 10/03/2016 16:01, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:45:44PM +0000, REIX, Tony wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are porting pari/gp 2.7.5 on AIX.
>> We are now using gcc (4.8.4). We plan to use xlc (v12).
>>
>> We'd like to compare benchmark results with "official" benchmark results.
>> However, on Pari/gp web-site, we only can find page :
>> <http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/buildlog.html>
>> http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/buildlog.html  and we do not understand
>> why some "bench" result are very small, like :
>>
>>
>> Mar 10
>> 11:19<http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/buildlogs/27f8423a-d25b-4e93-bafb-e3fb1cc7c46c>
>> 131      0      2.7.5    93f8512   amd64    linux   x86-64/GMP    g++
>> 5.3.1 +++ Total bench for gp-sta is 128 +++ Total bench for gp-dyn is
>> 131
>>
>> Mar 10
>> 11:18<http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/buildlogs/b1178ac6-3883-4963-850e-2c217512c498>
>> 187327   0      2.7.5    93f8512   amd64    linux   x86-64/GMP    gcc
>> 5.3.1 +++ Total bench for gp-sta is 178934 +++ Total bench for gp-dyn
>> is 187327
>>
>>
>> Looking at details, the list of tests that were run is either very
>> short or very long. Why ?
> See the color code at the top of buildlog.html:
>
> <green>  nnn: bench for gp-sta
> <cyan>   nnn: test-all for gp-sta
>
> There are two benchs:
>
> The short one (green) is
>    make bench
> The long one  (cyan) is
>    make statest-all
>
> the second one require the optional packages to be installed and is much
> longer.
>
> But unfortunately, neither of them is a good indicator of performances.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>