Re: New syntax of strslice

Bill Allombert on Fri, 23 Jun 2023 13:18:26 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New syntax of strslice

To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: New syntax of strslice
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 13:13:42 +0200
References: <f4172514-e4ef-46d7-fb7a-8a79695fe30e@free.fr>

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 01:35:01AM +0200, Jean-Luc ARNAUD wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> A very simple question, but I can't achieve to solve it :
> 
> What is the new syntax for the old strslice function?

I checked, and GP never has a strslice function...

Maybe rather tell us what you want to do with it!

Cheers,
Bill

References:
- New syntax of strslice
  - From: Jean-Luc ARNAUD <jl.arnaud@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Why is "lift(Mod(qnr, n)^(n\4))" 16% slower than C libgmp "powm(r, qnr, n/4, n)" ?
Next by Date: Re: How to compute "Mod(2^(n+1), n)" for very big n?
Previous by thread: Re: New syntax of strslice
Next by thread: Why is "lift(Mod(qnr, n)^(n\4))" 16% slower than C libgmp "powm(r, qnr, n/4, n)" ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread